| Andrzej Prinke 
       ADD MAP: The 
        Next Step Towards Full Computerisation of the Polish Archaeological Record Abstract Advances in the last dozen years in the documentation
        of archaeological sites which is a fundamental task of conservation
        policy, have mostly come about due to the computer
        technology.Its introduction in Poland has proceeded in
        three stages:   The concept of the all-country standard of site database software was accomplished in Poznan Archaeological Museum in 1986 (AZP_Fox) and upgraded in 1996 (AZP_Max; Fig. 1). It prints out the data in the Site Register Card standard format (Figs. 2 and 3). Our next step was to create a standard for
        archaeological digital maps (mAZePa), accomplished with
        the use of MapInfo software. It retrieves the required
        map according to:   The program reads the rich text files generated by AZP_Max all over the country. It produces maps of sites, selected according to any of 59 characteristics. Additional elements can be added as vector graphics. Any object can be described by labels. The mAZePa program has already been used to
        create some larger cartographic products:   The newest product is an archaeological ortophotomap,
        which ensures a considerably greater, realistic
        readability (Fig. 8).  INTRODUCTION: THE MAIN AIM OF COMPUTERISATION IN ARCHAEOLOGICAL HERITAGE MANAGEMENT Among the growing number of software products
        dedicated for archaeologists one can distinguish two
        broad categories:  Also maybe less spectacular than the former ones, the products from the second group seem to be a must in contemporary archaeological practice, especially in the heritage management service which is always challenged by a lack of time and manpower to face many threats to the heritage. The planning and then the execution of a conservation policy in the field of the protection of the archaeological heritage is based to a great degree on the listing and documentation of archaeological sites. The continual updating of these records is the basic task of the archaeological conservation services, and analysis of the data resources (in the form of standardised records of sites and the accompanying cartographic material) is the basis for the definition of hierarchies of needs and the creation of a programme of priorities for action. Advances which have taken place in the last dozen years in the field of the listing and documentation of archaeological sites have mostly comeabout due to the application of computer technology. This dynamically developing discipline has introduced increasingly improved applications of universal value and thus useful both for the professional archaeologist and especially for the needs of the archaeological heritage manager. Among their routine operations is the need for rapid selection and then the effective and exact analysis of data from huge archives of documentation, created over a number of years (in Poland - as the result of the creation of the Polish Archaeological Record, or AZP). 1. ARCHAEOLOGICAL DATABASES: FROM TEXT DATA TO DIGITAL MAPS The use of computer technology in the practice of archaeological heritage management is based on the creation and distribution of successive versions of specialist computer programs, designed as the result of cooperation between archaeologists and software engineers, in order to create and manage archaeological databases. The introduction of computer technology in Polish
        archaeology has so far proceeded in three stages:   Ad 1: The use of text databases already represented an
        advance compared with the traditional paper records (card
        indexes) and created conditions for the automation of the
        activities connected with the creation, sorting and
        updating of the basic component of the record, i.e., the
        textual information. After mastering the new tool, its
        users soon saw its advantages, such as:  Ad 2: The appearance of a new operating system MS Windows based on a graphics environment allowed the linking of graphics data to records with textual information. This enriched the archaeological databases with drawings, photographs etc. Ad 3: After a new type of computer program - known as
        Geographical Information Systems (GIS) - became popular
        at the beginning of the 1990s, further progress was
        possible. Digital maps could be produced by computer,
        which are electronic versions of geographical and
        topographical maps. The archaeologist - to whom the use
        of maps is a fundamental part of his work - is presented
        with new perspectives of creating specialist
        archaeological maps by computer. In order to apply these
        innovations, it was necessary to supplement the databases
        with information concerning the location of sites
        recorded in cartographic form. Fulfilling this
        requirement has opened new perspectives in the use of
        computers for archaeological purposes, among them the
        possibility of the execution of a series of routine
        heritage management procedures, e.g., :  Ad. c: An important argument for the introducing of digital maps to the daily practice of archaeological heritage management service (apart from the economy of effort and the increased precision of the results), is the fact that the same tools have been increasingly utilised by our partners in the wider use of archaeological data, that is planners, national and local government administrators and other specialised communal and public services. In such a situation, it would be a good system solution to create a map of archaeological sites as one layer of a multi-aspectual spatial planning document. For the archaeological heritage services this would have - among other advantages - an important strategic value, since it would eliminate the common practice of disregarding the problem of preserving the archaeological heritage in the planning process. 2. mAZePa: CARTOGRAPHIC MODULE FOR THE COMPUTER AZP STANDARD For many years the electronic databases of the AZP
        records held in each regional office of Archaeological
        Heritage Protection Service have formed a standardised
        nation-wide recording system. The concept of this
        standard, together with a prototype program intended to
        create and maintain a database of archaeological sites
        arose in Poznan Archaeological Museum as a result of a
        long-term project which started in 1986. Its main product
        is the program AZP_Fox, which was replaced in 1996 by its
        enlarged version AZP_Max (Fig.1).
        The program was introduced on the basis of:  The above-mentioned standard radically improved the
        accessibility of the masses of textual data on
        archaeological sites. As its use became more widespread,
        it could be seen as an efficient modern tool in the
        professional toolkit of the archaeologist, considerably
        shortening the searches for archival information of old
        discoveries, indispensable for almost every research
        project, museum activities and especially in heritage
        management. It also allows the printing  out the data in
        the same all-Polish standard format as the Site Register
        Card (KESA), used in AZP (Figs. 2 and 3). It contains, however,
        only the textual data on archaeological sites, while in
        many cases it is cartographic information which plays a
        key role - and even more frequently, the possibility of
        correlation of both types of information. The choice of
        our next step in the standardisation and automation of
        mass data was therefore clear, namely the creation of a
        standard for archaeological digital maps and their
        integration with the existing standard textual databases
        in the version of AZP_Fox and AZP_Max. With
        this aim in mind, in 1996 Poznan Archaeological Museum
        began work on the program mAZePa, which is
        intended to create and maintain archaeological digital
        maps concordant with the AZP standards (both of its
        traditional "paper" as well as its electronic
        form). The initial assumptions accepted by the authors of
        the program were:  We have selected MapInfo software for our tasks. It is one of the most popular GIS systems worldwide, and at the same time one of the cheapest. It is also a product developed for many years so its present version can be regarded as mature. The program is accessible in a Polish language version which certainly aids its introduction as a standard. An important feature of the system is its programmability, due to the compiler of a special programming language called MapBasic. 3. mAZePa: A SHORT OVERVIEW OF THE OF THE PROGRAM. The program mAZePa in its present form (version
        1.5, Fig.4) is able to
        execute the following basic functions:   5. Additional elements in the form of vector graphics can be superimposed on such a map. These may represent factors and phenomena important for heritage management, such as administrative boundaries, the line of a planned investment, areas which have not yet been investigated by the AZP etc. 6. Changes in the scale of the map. At present these are possible within the range of 1: 5 000 to 1: 20 000. Maps at a scale of 1: 50 000, 1: 100 000 and 1: 300 000 are in preparation. 7. The possibility to add descriptive labels to any objects on the map. They can be generated automatically from the database (e.g., the label for an archaeological site: locality name + site number + administrative district + chronology + culture). 8. The printing on the KESA card of a standardised
        location map of the site, previously selected and
        automatically formatted.  4. mAZePa: THE FIRST PRODUCTS In the course of the exploitation of the mAZePa program
        in the Department of the Protection of Archaeological
        Heritage in Poznan Archaeological Museum, besides using
        it in daily routine, it has been utilised as a tool for
        the creation of several larger cartographic products.
        These include:  The most recent initiative of our museum in the process of perfecting computer tools for archaeologists is the creation of so-called ortophotomaps, i.e., maps of the new generation, the background of which is formed from numerous aerial photographs of the area, mounted in such a manner as to avoid the linear and angular errors usual in normal photographs, which ensures at the same time a considerably greater - because realistic - readability of the map (Fig.8). Bibliography Prinke, A. 1992 Polish National Record of Archaeological Sites: A Computerization. In C.U.Larsen (ed.), Sites & Monuments. National Archaeological Records, 89-93. Copenhagen. Prinke, A. 1994 Can developing countries afford national archaeological record? The Polish answer. In Theme papers. Cultural Property, Conservation &. Public awareness; World Archaeological Congress - 3, New Delhi, December 4-11, 1994. New Delhi. Prinke, A. 1996 AZP_Fox, rel. 1.8. A computer database management system on archaeological sites. User's guide, Poznanskie Zeszyty Archeologiczno-Konserwatorskie (Poznan Archaeological Records) 4. Poznan. Prinke, A. 1997a AZP_Fox. A computer database management system on archaeological sites. Data entry, Poznanskie Zeszyty Archeologiczno-Konserwatorskie (Poznan Archaeological Records) 7. Poznan. (in Polish, with English summary). Prinke, A. (ed.) 1997b Recent threats to archaeological heritage. Conference papers, Poznan, April 17th, 1997, Poznanskie Zeszyty Archeologiczno-Konserwatorskie (Poznan Archaeological Records) 7, 67-70. Poznan (in Polish and German). Prinke, A. 1998 MuzArP, rel. 1.5. A computer system of integrated archaeological information (sites - research - finds). User's guide, Poznanskie Zeszyty Archeologiczno-Konserwatorskie (Poznan Archaeological Records) 9. Poznan. Prinke, A. (in press) Archeological Data Standard and its practical implementation. In International Conference "Archaeological Heritage: Inventory and Documentation Standards in Europe", Oxford.  |